November - 2011
| Previous Next | Showing Journal 12 of 13 |
Comparison of intraosseous versus central venous vascular access in adults under resuscitation in the emergency department with inaccessible peripheral veinsBernd A. Leidel, Chlodwig Kirchhoff, Viktoria Bogner, Volker Braunstein, Peter Biberthaler, Karl-Georg Kanz Resuscitation, 2011, published online 05 September 2011 This page is only available to Crit-IQ subscribers. To view the rest of this review and gain access to our vast array of critical care teaching tools including podcasts, vodcasts, modules, exam preparation tools, teaching aids and much more, login here, or Become a Member to register |
November |
Previous Comments
| Why did they compare it to landmark-based CVC -- does anyone use that method any more? | |
| caroline-17 Aug, 2012 02:30:04 PM | |
| I almost never put them in with landmarks anymore. However, I still set up and check my landmarks before I use the US, because you never know when you're going to need to do it the old fashioned way. | |
| Joseph-30 Aug, 2012 02:42:21 PM | |
Comment
Has the humble interosseous come of age? Success rates and insertion times compared favourably with central venous access when peripheral IVs were found to be difficult.
Join the blog on this article to share your views
...